Editor's Note: Tom Hayden, reporting for AlterNet from the Free
Trade Area of the Americas conference in Miami, filed this update
Thursday evening. The original story follows the update.
UPDATE. MIAMI. 10:30 EST, Thursday An ugly and bloodier ending
to the Miami FTAA meeting was averted by a sudden decision tonight to
end the closed official events one day early. FTAA co-chairs from the US
and Brazil both described the summit as a step forward though it was
widely understood that the agreement was far less than the American business community and the White House originally hoped for.
At 5:30 pm, besieged protestors at the convergence center, threatened
by the spectre of mass arrests, put out a televised appeal for public
solidarity. At virtually the same moment, word came from within the FTAA
meeting that an agreement had been reached. At 6:45, the agreement was
announced at a press conference of all the trade ministers, and shortly
afterwards the police encirclement of the convergence center seemed to
be lifted.
"They finished early because there was nothing to be gained from
another day of bad publicity from the streets, and there was nothing to
negotiate beyond an agreement to keep negotiating in the future," said
Washington-based trade expert Mark Weisbrot. A perplexed Wall Street
Journal reporter asked FTAA officials whether "after nine years you've
agreed to keep moving forward but with lesser goals than before."
Brazilian foreign minister Celso Amorim, carefully choosing a word in
English said only that the agreement was "enabling."
Enabling what? The beginning of "NAFTA on steroids" for the whole
hemisphere, as global justice advocates fear? Or the further retreat of
the Bush Administration from its pretensions to empire as American
public opinion begins to swing against unilateralism in trade and war.
That is the big question the global justice movement now confronts.
Earlier in the day
MIAMI – Protestors seemed to skirmish with heavily armored Miami
police outside the Riande Hotel Thursday morning, but nothing is at it
seems this week. These "anarchists" were undercover police officers
whose mission was to provoke a confrontation.
The crowd predictably panicked, television
cameras moved in, the police lines parted, and I watched through a
nearby hotel window as two undercover officers disguised as
"anarchists," thinking they were invisible, hugged each other. They
excitedly pulled tasers and other weapons out of their camouflage cargo
pants, and slipped away in an unmarked police van.
On the other side of the impenetrable police barricade, a young woman
with a video camera was bent over, vomiting from pepper spray. The
nonviolent revolutionary Starhawk stood blinded for 10 minutes as
friends washed her eyes. Others knelt paralyzed on the street.
A few hours later, hundreds of peaceful protestors – and a few
shocked reporters – sitting quietly in Bayfront Park on Biscayne
Boulevard were sprayed like unwanted pests by officers who described
themselves as Robo-Cops.
So began a day that could be explained as a planned overreaction by
the City of Miami, the Governor of Florida and his supportive brother in
the White House. Within a few hours, the massive police force was
firing pepper gas and rubber bullets at 120 miles an hour against a
small crowd of surrounded resisters who could have been easily
contained.
"Jeb Bush would love to see a riot over FTAA," lamented Fred Morris,
Florida director of the National Council of Churches, when I interviewed
him the day before. It seemed a little paranoid at the moment, but Rev.
Morris spoke from experience. "They've been bringing in riot units from
all over Florida to patrol streets when nothing was going on. My wife
and I were stopped twice by police this week and they were very hostile.
I can handle that, but somebody younger and more impatient might get
shovy."
We were standing on a downtown street corner where the local ACLU,
Catholic activists and Unitarians held a press conference condemning
First Amendment abuses. Under a newly adopted ordinance, groups of seven
or more people are forbidden to stop on a sidewalk for longer than 29
minutes without a permit. The Miami City Council decided not to
criminalize puppets but banned materials such as stilts "more than three
quarters inch in its thickest dimension" and "containers of any kind."
Hundreds of downtown businessmen, hearing that "Seattle-type
anarchists" were descending on Miami, lost hundreds of thousands of
dollars by closing their doors for the past week. The few who remained
open – camera stores, small shops, taco stands – did brisk business
without a single incident of property damage (as of 6:00 p.m. Thursday).
A few days ago, police shattered a parked car at Florida State
University when they noticed a "suspicious container" that turned out to
be gray paint for a photo gallery.
Next, the entire downtown was shut down by hundreds of officers in
response to the arrival of a nonviolent march by 200 farm worker
supporters from Ft. Lauderdale, 34 miles away.
Then on Wednesday, police uncovered a nest of alleged "anarchists" in
an abandoned Miami mansion, and led television crews to a cache of
weapons including newly minted chain and bright new gasoline cans. The
evidence smelled, and not of gasoline, but not a single reporter
questioned the incident. The anarchist stash was not exactly weapons of
mass destruction, but enough to justify the police buildup on the eve of
the protests.
With $8.5 million provided from the taxpayer funds meant for Iraq,
the Miami police have splurged on "non-lethal" weapons, including CS-gas
sprays. Gleaming new desert-colored armored personnel carriers and
bright green water-cannon trucks backed the police presence on the
streets.
Newscasters embedded Iraq-style among the police provided a
complementary narrative rationalizing the show of force. For example,
when a young white woman holding her fingers in a V-sign was shot point
blank with a rubber bullet, the local ABC commentator said without the
slightest evidence, "She took a rubber bullet in the stomach, she must
have done something. You wanna play, you gotta pay."
A local NBC commentator seemed to speak for official Miami when she
proudly declared that, despite a few incidents, Miami "was nothing like
Seattle in 1999."
No authority or pundit questioned why the protestor turnout was less
than 15,000 after months of official "intelligence" warning that 20,000
to 100,000 might blight the city's blissful reputation. Here in Miami,
the AFL-CIO turnout was perhaps 5,000, including steelworkers wearing
T-shirts declaring "FTAA Sucks."
Two hundred forty trade unionists wearing "Wellstone Lives" T-shirts
journeyed all the way from Minnesota. AFL-CIO President John Sweeney
attacked the FTAA fiercely and paid a visit to the protestors'
convergence center. But a comparison with Seattle four years ago, where
50,000 trade unionists marched, was never planned or considered
realistic by the protest coalition.
It may be hard for most Americans to believe this was all a hoax, and
of course the Miami events are not over yet. But the telling comparison
that should be made is not with Seattle 1999, but with the anti-WTO
protests in Cancun, Mexico, just two months ago. There a Mexican police
force with a long record of human rights abuses protected the WTO
Ministerial with no offensive force, no gassing, no beatings and
virtually no arrests. Protestors outside the fences in Cancun were far
more aggressive than in Miami today. It was the first significant
de-escalation of state violence in the history of anti-globalization
protests. Miami and U.S. police officials were there as observers, but
chose not to repeat the non-violent peacekeeping example of Cancun.
Miami Mayor Manny Diaz called the police presence "a model for
homeland defense." Two weeks ago, Miami chief John Timoney was quoted as
saying his strategy would be "a failure" if tear gas was used. Tonight
he actually claimed on CBS that the demonstrators and not the police
used the tear gas. Anyway, he continued, it was not tear gas but "pepper
spray with a capsule formula."
As to protests scheduled for Friday, "if they engage in lawful
activity, we're gonna arrest them." He didn't notice the misstatement –
if indeed it was one.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This page contains copyrighted
material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the
copyright owner. NoNonsense English offers this material
non-commercially for research and educational purposes. I believe this
constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for
in 17 U.S.C § 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this
site for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain
permission from the copyright owner, i.e. the media service or newspaper
which first published the article online and which is indicated at the
top of the article unless otherwise specified. |