Miami -- Noel Cleland has lived in Miami-Dade County for 48 of his 51
years. He is well educated -- a biomedical engineer -- and engaged in
the community as an active member of Coral Gables Congregational Church.
Until recently, the county's two civilian oversight panels -- known as the CIP and IRP -- were mere alphabet soup to him.
Then
came last month's free trade talks in Miami, which attracted thousands
of protesters and sparked an outcry among activists who say police
mistreated peaceful demonstrators. Cleland, who attended the protests
with his daughter on Nov. 20, says he witnessed police misconduct, which
prompted him to learn about the panels and file complaints with them.
But
Cleland is the exception among the protesters. Most are unaware of or
distrust the boards, which plan to hold a joint public hearing Jan. 15
to address allegations of abuse by police during the Free Trade Area of
the Americas meeting.
At a time when allegations of abuse against
protesters abound, the panels will have to walk a fine line. Both
panels were put in place to police the police but neither have any real
power to enforce their proposals.
To be effective, the panels
must be deemed independent and their investigations credible by police
and government officials. The panels face an uphill battle: many of the
protesters were from out of state and are now unavailable or unwilling to voice their objections to panel members.
One
activist group has even suggested that protesters not submit official
complaints with the oversight boards for fear their testimony might do
more harm than good.
So far, only about two dozen people have
filed grievances with the panels, although more than 200 were arrested,
dozens hit by rubber bullets and many more pepper-sprayed.
Still, community leaders remain hopeful complaints will trickle in.
"What
is needed is to get enough of these stories told and into public
awareness so that people can begin to react to them as facts and not
just dismiss them out of hand," said community activist Santiago Leon.
"Every story that is reproduced, every observation that is recorded, is
valuable."
Police say they will take the panels' findings seriously.
Though they have the same goals, the two boards couldn't be more different.
In
existence for more than two decades, the county's Independent Review
Panel was created following the Arthur McDuffie riots of 1980 after a
jury acquitted five county police officers in the beating death of a
black motorcyclist.
Often at odds with the powerful police union,
the county panel is seen by critics as weak and ineffective. Countless
efforts to strengthen the board have failed.
"It would be useful for us to have [subpoena powers] but I don't think it prevents us from doing our jobs," said Carol Boersma, executive assistant to the IRP's director.
Boersma said the panel's power lies in its ability to make its suggestions public, which have given rise to change in the past.
By
comparison, the city's newly created Civilian Investigative Panel holds
more promise for activists, who say the group is arguably the most
powerful of its kind in the nation.
With a $674,000 budget and
armed with the power to compel testimony, board members say they are
ready to live up to the mission given them by voters fed up with
questionable police shootings.
However different, neither board has the power to make their recommendations binding.
"We
recognize that residents of Miami have fought to get those boards in
place and we respect that, but at the same time, the boards have no
enforcement ability to compel policy changes with the police," said
Andrea Costello, an attorney with Miami Activist Defense, which advised
protesters to check with an attorney before filing complaints with the
panels.
Costello said her group has taken about 200 police
misconduct reports and witness statements in preparation for civil
action against the police departments -- a tactic she says better
protects people's civil rights.
Many see the fledgling panel's investigation of the abuse claims as its first big test.
Some
observers think the city's panel has a shot at engendering change, as
long as members come up with reasonable recommendations.
"The
true test is: Are they going to be rubber stamps of the system?" said
Lida Rodriguez-Taseff, president of Greater Miami Chapter of the
American Civil Liberties Union. "If the CIP fails, it will not be
because of the structure, it will be because of the members."
At
least one member, Peter Roulhac, came under fire for praising Miami
Police Chief John Timoney at a Greater Miami Chamber of Commerce
luncheon for the way he handled the anti-globalization protests.
At
a recent meeting, panel members said Peter Roulhac, who is also
president of the business organization, should remain on the panel.
Roulhac
said at the meeting that he didn't intend to create controversy when he
made the comments and thinks he can still be impartial and a do fair
job as a panel member.
Cleland, who attended the protests because
he thinks the trade agreement undermines democracy, remains optimistic
the panels will give people like him a chance to tell their stories.
"I
saw people who were doing absolutely nothing wrong being hit by the
police," said Cleland, whose daughter was hit by a rubber bullet. "If
you have a large number of people with a similar opinion and a lot of
witnesses, it lends credibility to the idea that there might have been
an improper use of force."
FAIR USE NOTICE: This page contains copyrighted
material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the
copyright owner. NoNonsense English offers this material
non-commercially for research and educational purposes. I believe this
constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for
in 17 U.S.C ยง 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this
site for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain
permission from the copyright owner, i.e. the media service or newspaper
which first published the article online and which is indicated at the
top of the article unless otherwise specified. |